Memories of a present time about animal love

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/16696581e237

Keywords:

equality, human nature, violence, love, animal, animality

Abstract

In this essay, we will try to understand to what extent the philosophical tradition based on the principle of equality, linked to the notion of human nature, would have gradually led to the justification and even to the foundation of an ethical and political disregard for animal and for animality. More precisely, from a perspective that mobilizes Michel Foucault's interpretations  of the care of the self in the Socratic-platonic period, under the light [A] of Jean-Pierre Vernant's analysis of the differences between archaic and classical antiquity, but also [B] of Judith Butler's reflections on moral violence, we will indicate how the philosophical emergence of the principle of equality would have influenced the structure of a moralistic dynamic that explicitly or implicitly violates the animal, and all who are biologically or ethically distinguished from the norms that describe the human being and prescribe their humanity. Our article consists of four parts that mark the temporality of the animal question and express its urgency in the present time. Through the narration of possible articulations between the present and the past, we seek to diagnose the anthropocentric limits of ethical ad political philosophy and, at the same time, to envision non-anthropocentric relationships between humans and animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Cassiana Lopes Stephan, Universidade Federal do Paraná/ Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Críticos Animales

Doutoranda em Filosofia, na Área de Ética e Política, pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR / Brasil) com estágio de pesquisa na Université de Lille, Sciences Humaines et Sociales, junto ao Laboratoire Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL). Atualmente em residência de pesquisa pelo Centro Michel Foucault em parceria com L'Institut Mémoires de l'Édition ContemporaineFaz parte da equipe editorial do Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Críticos Animales

 

 

References

Blanchot, M. (2012). La communauté inavouable. Paris, France : Les Éditions Minuit.

Butler, J. (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. New York, United States: Fordham University Press.

Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: theories in subjection. California, United States: Stanford University Press.

Chebili, S. (1999). Figures de l’animalité dans l’œuvre de Michel Foucault. Paris, France : L’Harmattan.

Custer, O. (2009). Se dire humain : violence et responsabilité. In : Monique David-Ménard (Dir.). Sexualités, genres et mélancolies : s’entretenir avec Judith Butler (pp.37-61). Paris, France : Campagne Première.

Despret, V. (2009). Rencontrer un animal avec Donna Haraway. Critique : Libérer les animaux ?, LXV (747-748), 745-757.

Diogenes Laertius (1972). Live of Eminent Philosophers (Trad. R.D. Hicks). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990). The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis. Aarchus, Denmark: Aarchus University Press.

Foucault, M. (2011). A coragem da verdade (Trad. Eduardo Brandão). São Paulo, Brasil: Martins Fontes.

Foucault, M. (2010). A hermenêutica do sujeito (Trad. Salma Tannus Muchail e Márcio Alves da Fonseca). São Paulo, Brasil: Martins Fontes.

Foucault, M. (2001). Dits et Écrits II. 1976-1988. Paris, France : Gallimard.

Foucault, M. (2012). História da sexualidade 2 – O uso dos prazeres (Trad. Maria Thereza da Costa Albuquerque). São Paulo, Brasil: Graal.

Foucault, M. (2008a). Nascimento da Biopolítica (Trad. Eduardo Brandão). São Paulo, Brasil: Martins Fontes.

Foucault, M. (2008b). Segurança, Território, População (Trad. Eduardo Brandão). São Paulo, Brasil: Martins Fontes.

Freud, S. (2011). O mal-estar na civilização (Trad. Paulo César de Souza). São Paulo, Brasil: Companhia das letras.

Goldin, O. (2001). Porphyry, Nature, and Community. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 18 (4), 353-371. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27744898.

Hierocles (2009). Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments and Excerpts. Boston, United States: Brill.

Labarrière, J-L. (2000). Raison humaine et intelligence animale dans la philosophie grecque. Terrain : Les animaux pensent-ils ? (34), 107-122. Consulté en ligne http://journals.openedition.org/terrain/996. Doi : 10.4000/terrain.996.

Nietzsche, F. (2012). A Gaia e a Ciência (Trad. Paulo César de Souza). São Paulo, Brasil: Companhia das Letras.
Platão (2006). A República: ou Sobre a justiça, diálogo político (Trad. Ana Lia Amaral de Almeida Prado). São Paulo, Brasil: Martins Fontes.

Preciado, P. (le 26 septembre 2014). Le féminisme n’est pas un humanisme. Libération. Consulté en ligne : https://www.liberation.fr/chroniques/2014/09/26/le-feminisme-n-est-pas-un-humanisme_1109309.

Vernant, J-P. (2011). L’individu, la mort, l’amour : soi-même et l’autre en Grèce ancienne. Paris, France: Gallimard.

Published

2019-11-06

How to Cite

Lopes Stephan, C. (2019). Memories of a present time about animal love. Question/Cuestión, 1(64). https://doi.org/10.24215/16696581e237