La imaginación narrativa de Martha Nussbaum ante la crítica académica

Luis Alfonso Argüello Guzmán

doi:10.24215/16696581e099

Authors

Luis Alfonso Argüello Guzmán Instituto de Educación a Distancia; Universidad del Tolima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24215/16696581e099

Keywords:

Martha Nussbaum, narrative imagination, academic criticism, reading spheres.

Abstract

This article presents a bibliographic revision about some authors who have presented some claims in favor and against Martha Nussbaum’s concept of narrative imagination. The present revision is developed in three stages: the first one presents the general features of Martha Nussbaum’s claims on the concept of Narrative Imagination. The second stage corresponds to a descriptive revision of the critical statements associated to Nussbaum’s category in question, which are mainly presented in two critical issues: the one from critical ethics and the other comes from literature as moral philosophy. The third part of this article centers its general interest on the conceptual possibilities of narrative imagination and particularly on the potential it has in the encounter of reading spheres in higher education

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luis Alfonso Argüello Guzmán, Instituto de Educación a Distancia; Universidad del Tolima

Profesor de Teoría Literaria en el el programa de Licenciatura en Literatura y Lengua Castellana del Instituto de Educación a Distancia (IDEAD) de la Universidad del Tolima. Licenciado en Lingüística y Literatura de la Universidad Surcolombiana, Especialista en Pedagogía de la Universidad del Tolima y candidato a Doctor en Humanidades, Humanismo y Persona de la Universidad San Buenaventura, sede Bogotá.

References

Andrews, M. (2014). Narrative imagination and everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Antaki, M. (2012). The Turn to imagination in legal Theory: the re-enchantment of the world? Law Critique, 23, 1-20.

Bermúdez Pérez, E. P. (2014). La Literatura en la formación de ciudadanos. El desafío de una educación para la democracia. Revista Amauta, 23, 119-130.

Bevan, R. (2006). Creed between the lines: the values and potential of literature in education. (Tesis de Maestría). Concordia University, Canadá.

Booth, W. (1998). Why Banning Ethical Criticism is a Serious Mistake. Philosophy and Literature, 22(2), pp. 366-393.

Buell, L. (1999). Introduction: in pursuits of ethics. PMLA (special topic: Ethics and Literary Studies), 114(1), 7-19.

Carroll, N. (2000). Art and ethical criticism: and overview of recent direction of research. Ethic, 110(2), 350-387.

Clavel, S. (2012). Martha Nussbaum et les usages de la

Littérature en Philosophie Morale. Revue Philosophique, 1(137), 89-100.

Coeckelbergh, M. (2007). Imagination and principles. An Essay on the rol of imagination n moral deliberation. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Diamond, C. (1999). Martha Nussbaum and the need for the novels. En Adamson, J.; Freedman, R. y Parker, D. Renegotiating ethic in literature, philosophy and theory (pp. 39-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Diamond, C. (1983). Having story about what Moral Philosophy is. New Literary History, 15(1), 155-169.

Fonnegra, C. P. (2012). La Narrativa como vía para la reflexión ética y política. Una aproximación a partir de los planteamientos teóricos de Paul Ricoeur, Hannah Arendt y Martha Nussbaum. (Tesis de Maestría). Universidad EAFIT, Colombia.

Hamilton, S. (2004). Ethics and Literature: love and perception in Henry James. (Tesis de Maestría). Louisiana State University, Estados Unidos.

Hämäläinen, N. (2016). Literature and moral theory. London: Bloombury.

Hänes, K. y Jansen, L. (2001). Reading for the good life? En Kallhoff, A. (Ed.). Martha C. Nussbaum: ethics and political philosophy (pp. 119-128). Müster: Lit Verlag.

Hidalgo, D. C. (2010). La Imaginación literaria como proyección del otro. Una reflexión desde la justicia poética de Martha Nussbaum. (Trabajo de grado). Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Colombia.

Horton, J. (2003). Life, literature and ethical theory: Martha Nussbaum on the role of literary imagination in ethical thought. En Horton, J. and Baumeister, A. Literature and political imagination (pp. 70-97). London: Routledge.

Jiménez Bósquez, D. A. (2016). Educación emocional para una ciudadanía cosmopolita. La propuesta de Nussbaum. Quito: Publicaciones de la Pontifica Universidad Católica del Ecuador.

Johnson, P. (2004). Moral philosopher and the novel: a study Winch, Nussbaum and Rorty. London: Palgrave.

Kalin, J. (1992). Knowing novels: Nussbaum on fiction and moral theory. Ethics, 103, 135-151.

Koopman, E. M. y Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: a theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literature Journal, 9(19), 79-111.

Llanera, T. (2014). Morality by words: Murdoch, Nussbaum, Rorty. Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture, 18(1), 1-17.

Lourens, H. (2009). From Fiction to phronésis. A Critical dialogue with Martha Nussbaum on the importance of concrete fictional literature in moral philosophy. (Tesis de Maestría). Stellenbosch University, Sudáfrica.

Maxwell, B. (2006). Naturalized compassion: a critique of Nussbaum on literature as education form compassionate citizenry. Journal of Moral Education, 35(3), 335-352.

Mcgregor, R. F. (2013). The Autonomy of Literature. (Tesis Doctoral). University of York, Reino Unido.

Mélich, J. C. (1994). Del Extraño al cómplice. La educación en la vida cotidiana. Barcelona: Anthropos.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Sin fines de lucro. Por qué la democracia necesita humanidades. Buenos Aires: Katz editors.

Nussbaum, M. C. (1998). Exactly and responsibly: a defense of ethical criticism. Philosophy and Literature, 22(2), 334-365.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2005). Cultivando la humanidad. Una defensa clásica de la reforma de la educación liberal (traducción J. Pailaya). Barcelona: Paidós.

Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Justicia poética. La Imaginación literaria y la vida pública (traducción C. Gardini). Santiago de Chile: Editorial Andrés Bello.

Pamuk, O. (2012). Museos y novela. En El novelista ingenuo y el novelista sentimental (pp. 97-119). Barcelona: Mondadori.

Posner, R. A. (1998). Against ethical criticism: part two. Philosophy and Literature, 22(2), 394-412.

Posner, R. A. (1997). Against ethical criticism. Philosophy and Literature, 22(1), 1-27.

Putnam, H. (1983). Taking rules seriously: a response to Martha Nussbaum. New Literary History, 15(1), 193-200.

Reyes, Y. (2007). La casa imaginaria. Lectura y Literatura en la primera infancia. Bogotá: Norma.

Robbins, W. E. (2015). Science Fiction is good for you too: a reply to Martha Nussbaum´s theory of literary engagement. (A Thesis in partial fulfillments of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts). University of Saskatchewan, Canadá.

Singleton, J. (2006). Henry James- Aristotle´s ally, an exclusive pact? Philosophy and Literature, 30(1), 61-78.

Stow, S. (2000). Unbecoming virulence: the political of the Ethical Criticism debate. Philosophy and Literature, 24, 185-196.

Voice, P. (1994). Why Literature cannot be Moral Philosophy. Theory, 83/84, 123-134.

Von Wright, M. (2002). Narrative imagination and taking the perspectives of other. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(4), 407-416.

Wollheim, R. (1983). Flawed Crystals James´s the Golden Bowl and the plausibility of Literature and Moral Philosophy. New Literary History, 15(1), 185-191.